Shareswatch Australia Blog

Views about the Australian stock market, shares, the economy, investing, politics and world events.

Shareswatch Australia Blog header image 2


Are we facing a peak demand scenario for Australian coal and iron ore?

June 10th, 2009 · Greg Atkinson · 10 Comments

Almost everyday we hear about how commodities exports have helped protect Australia (so far) from the worst of the global economic crisis. However although Australian exports have held up well prices and volumes have still fallen for many mining products but almost nobody seems to be asking the question, what will happen if demand and prices for some key Australian commodities never returns to the levels reached in 2008?

Sometimes I wonder if many Australian financial journalists and market commentators realise that the world is a fairly big place and that Australia is not the only nation that digs stuff out of the ground. In addition many seem blissfully unaware that some nations realise that they rely on Australia too much for everything from LNG to Uranium and are actively seeking alternative sources of supply or ways to reduce demand.

We also have the Government and Treasury confident that the demand for resources will pick-up again and in fact they are counting on this to help pay down Australia’s debt in the years to come. But is it possible that demand for some of our key mining exports has already peaked and that prices will remain below recent highs for many years to come?

GaveKal Research have a very talented oil market specialist named Ahmad Abdallah who has written for some time now about Peak Demand, (see: Peak Demand)
which is a scenario where oil starts to enter not only a long term decline in terms of supply, but also in terms of demand. Many people often raise their eyebrows when a long term fall in oil demand is mentioned but consider this, Japan’s oil use peaked back in the 1970’s and apart from some blimps along the way has managed to keep below 1970’s levels ever since.

Demand reduction for commodities such as oil, coal and even iron ore can be achieved via improved technology, product substitution or simply just because of reduced economic activity. In Japan’s case smaller more fuel efficient vehicles combined with an excellent mass transit system have helped reduce the need for imported oil.

So you may ask how would a nation reduce it’s demand for coal? Well many G20 countries are already looking at non-fossil fuel sources of energy as a way to reduce their CO2 emissions and although Australia seems all starry eyed about so called “Clean Coal”, most large energy consuming nations are pushing ahead with plans to build more nuclear power plants and carry out capacity upgrades. (see: Plans for New Reactors Worldwide )

In addition billions of dollars are being spent worldwide on new facilities to generate energy from the sun, wind, water, tides, garbage and even the earth’s own trapped heat. (geothermal) So isn’t it possible that coal in any form will become a less desirable source of energy as the 21st century progresses? Then of course there will be further improvements in energy efficiency and this will reduce (to some extent) the growing demand for energy across the world anyway.

Iron Ore on the other hand has no known substitutes and is likely to be very much in demand for many years ahead. However this does not necessarily mean that the demand for Australian iron ore will continue to rise and that Australian miners will be able to set prices again in the future. Africa and Russia for example are also ramping up production and in the years ahead countries like Brazil and Australia might find their iron ore operations facing much stiffer competition.

In 2008, iron, iron ore and steel plus coal made up 36% of Australia’s total merchandise exports and altogether mining exports contributed 61%. If we compare this to say Canada (another resource rich country similar to Australia) we find their mining exports only contributed 35% but overall they are a bigger exporter than Australia.

How can this be you may ask? Simply because Canada is also a significant exporter of manufactured products which contributed 31% of the value of their exports compared to a paltry 7% for Australia. (source: Australia and Canada – Comparing Notes on Recent Experiences) I suggest readers have a look at the above speech by Glenn Stevens from the RBA, it is an interesting read.

Because Canada has a more diversified economy this has meant that so far it has suffered more than Australia as a result of the global economic downturn. However this also means that Canada is better positioned to deal with any long term softness in commodities prices. In Australia mining exports have delivered the good times, but our reliance on them could also cause us a lot of pain in the future.

Imagine how Australia’s trade figures would look in the years ahead if demand for Australian iron ore and coal never recovered to 2008 levels and prices remained flat. This would slash billions off the value of our exports and it is quite possible that other exports may not be able to make up for this drop.

Remember we are not the only supplier of commodities. Japan aims to source Uranium from Russia and is actively seeking to reduce it’s dependence on Australia coal by building a number of new generation nuclear power plants. China has increased iron ore imports from Russia and also has plans to ramp up energy generation via nuclear power.

There are large deposits of iron ore and other commodities in Africa and even within Asia there are mining operations that have yet to reach their full potential. So is it wise for Australia to be so complacent and believe that we are somehow the undisputed mining champions of the world?

It may appear inconceivable to many that Australia’s strong mining sector could be challenged in the future and even face a period of decline. But 20 years ago how many Americans thought that their car industry would end up on it’s knees? Didn’t they once think that their auto workers were the most productive in the world and that the United States would continue to dominate the car market across the world….or at least domestically!

Of course I could be very wrong; the Japanese and Chinese may forgive Australian miners for charging over the top prices during the boom, things could all get back to normal and demand and prices for Australian commodities surge back up again. But what if I am right?

Where is Australia’s Plan B and I wonder if the Treasury modelled any scenarios where commodities exports remained weak for many years and if so, what impact will this have in terms of future Federal Budgets and in reducing Australia’s debt? Do we as a nation have any plans to deal with a world where our miners may no longer be in such a dominant position?

Related posts:

  1. What might an Australian economic slump look like?
  2. Australian stocks, house prices and the economy in September 2010
  3. Is the Australian economy really booming?
  4. The two speed economy, debt and the fantasyland federal budget.
  5. A slow global recovery, the Australian economy & the stock market.


10 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Scott // Jun 12, 2009 at 1:07 pm

    Great article Greg. This is something that is not often talked about but the potential negative impact would be enormous. I too wonder what goes on within the treasury in terms of analysing our potential medium to long term economic situation.

  • 2 Greg Atkinson // Jun 12, 2009 at 4:42 pm

    Hi Scott. thanks for the feedback. I worry about the sort of forecasts, planning etc. churned out by the Treasury as I would imagine “Group Think” would be the order of the day. I cannot imagine you would have much of a career there if you challenged the consensus view of where the economy was going, or where the Government said the economy was going!

  • 3 Pete // Jun 15, 2009 at 10:06 pm

    Where is Australia’s Plan B and I wonder if the Treasury modelled any scenarios where commodities exports remained weak for many years and if so, what impact will this have in terms of future Federal Budgets and in reducing Australia’s debt?

    There is no Plan B…

    Although I expect that if we get to that stage, the Gov. will have to start funding itself (printing money). I guess we’ll see

  • 4 Greg Atkinson // Aug 23, 2009 at 9:15 am

    What I don’t quite get is that Rio, BHP etc are cautious about the outlook for commodities and yet the RBA/Treasury are expecting Australian to bounce back from 2010. It seems the Government is counting a lot on demand from China holding up but maybe the miners can already see weakness in demand?

  • 5 Greg Atkinson // Oct 29, 2009 at 12:24 pm

    Interesting article in The Australian today: China may seek thermal coal elsewhere if Australian export costs rise, says report

    As I have been saying for a long time, Australia is not the only nation that digs stuff up.

  • 6 Greg Atkinson // May 27, 2010 at 2:24 pm

    Interesting comments from Tim Flannery reported today online at WA Business News:

    ” Prof Flannery also had an alarming prognosis for coal, which is the backbone of Australia’s economy but is a heavy-emitting source of energy.

    The great hope for coal’s future – the burying of carbon emissions underground, called carbon capture and storage – is not working, Prof Flannery said.

    The technology was ready but interest had flagged and large-scale CCS plants were not being built.

    Prof Flannery said the world had to get rid of conventional coal-fired power stations within 20 years to avoid dangerous warming.

    This would be big news for Australia, which has massive coal reserves.

    Three-quarters of the country’s electricity comes from coal. Coal is Australia’s biggest export item, worth $46 billion in 2008. “

    Seems my peak demand view might not be crazy after all hey? :)

  • 7 Biker Pete // May 27, 2010 at 2:31 pm

    Nor my notes over a year ago re China’s worldwide thorium quest.
    :)

    DRA has become decidely bullish on China recently. It’s quite interesting to note their comments on the massive expansion of rail links in China.

  • 8 Greg Atkinson // Jun 19, 2010 at 8:41 am

    Well it seems even the Australia media is starting to write about Mongolia. This article in The Australian makes interesting reading: Leighton takes train to Mongolia’s mining boom

    Of particluar interest to me was this passage:

    “…the listed Energy Resources LLC, is selling high-quality coking coal to the neighbouring Chinese at $US60 per tonne compared to Australian miners BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto, who are charging more than double the price.”

    I wonder how much per tonne the Treasury reckons Australia will be getting for coking coal during what Ken Henry believes will be a decade long mining boom?

  • 9 Ned S // Jun 19, 2010 at 8:24 pm

    “LLC, is selling high-quality coking coal to the neighbouring Chinese at $US60 per tonne compared to Australian miners BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto, who are charging more than double the price” – Or as Kev Rudd said to Wayne after they took a quick glance back through the fine print in last month’s budget – “What did you say Plan B was again?” :)

    On another note, the good news in here for Japan (and Germany even), might seem to be that they’ve taken most of their whack in regard to the following? :

    http://www.smh.com.au/business/population-fall-poses-immense-new-challenges-20100618-yms8.html

  • 10 Greg Atkinson // Jun 20, 2010 at 11:21 am

    Ned as you know, I reckon we don’t have a Plan B for the Australian economy. It a resources boom or nothing.

    As for the population issue, well I don’t think it is such a bad thing if the world’s population stabilizes or even falls back a touch. We have to get past the 18th century thinking of “populate or perish” and learn to live within our means.

    The population in Japan will level out at some point and by then I would imagine robots will be providing a lot more labor than they do now. This isn’t in the realm of science fiction by the way, they are already around 300,000 or more working robots in Japan now. See: http://www.asahi.com/english/TKY201003260322.html

Leave a Comment

Subscribe without commenting


 

This site is not intended to act as any form of financial or investment advice.  © 2008–2010 Shareswatch Australia Blog — DisclaimerCutline by Chris Pearson