Shareswatch Australia

Australian stock market investing, ASX charts, analysis & market forecasts.

Shareswatch Australia header image 2


Media vultures circle Japan’s P.M.

May 27th, 2010 · Gregory Clark · 11 Comments

In Brazil they tell the story of the small-town TV crime reporter who gained fame and scoops by arranging crimes himself. He could then rush out and interview the victims well before rivals. But eventually his scoops caught up with him and he ended up in jail.

Jail is where a lot of the Japanese media should also be. Prime ministers are their favorite victims. They hover like hungry vultures waiting for a moment of weakness, often through the negative opinion poll ratings that they themselves organize.

Then they attack. The more they attack the more the favorable poll ratings decline. Then when the figures get down below the 30-percent level they move in for the kill and begin to call for a change of prime ministers.

True, and unlike with the Brazilian reporter, they have to share their “scoops” with fellow vultures. But they get a double dip. They get to fill many column inches of reportage on the way down. And they fill even more column inches on the way up, as the race gets under way to find, elect and install a new prime minister.

Much the same process is now under way around prime minister, Yukio Hatoyama, trying desperately to find a replacement for U.S. Marine Air Station Futenma in a nation where few will accept U.S. bases in their location.

Meanwhile, the United States says it will not accept any alternative that does not meet its own demands and that the population in the proposed location will not accept. Anywhere else in the world the media would sympathize with a leader put in this impossible position. Some would even ask why Japan has to accept the bases in the first place. But not in Japan.

It is taken for granted that failure to meet U.S. demands before the end-of-May deadline should automatically push the prime minister into a resignation dilemma. The fact that many in Washington have a vested interest in seeing the pacifist, Asia-first, Hatoyama removed is also ignored.

Nor do any in the media seem to want to expose the hypocrisy of the former ruling Liberal Democratic Party on this issue. The LDP was unable for years to overcome local resistance to build — at Henoko, Okinawa — the alternative site that the U.S. wanted.

But it encourages local resistance to a Hatoyama plan for another alternative site in nearby Tokunoshima, and then uses that resistance as yet more proof that Hatoyama should resign for failing to satisfy U.S. demands. The phoniness of the indignation with which the LDP leader, Sadokazu Tanigaki, attacks Hatoyama on the issue is ignored.

Maybe there were a few obscure ex-Soviet or ultraright Latin-American republics that allowed the fate of their prime ministers to be decided by the whims of a foreign power. But this is Japan. Is it supposed to lower itself to that same levels of degradation?

We are told the alternative base is needed for Japan security. But the main activity of the Futenma helicopters to date has been support for U.S. adventures in Vietnam and Afghanistan. What is that supposed to do for Japan security? It is said to deter Chinese military action against Taiwan. And what if that in turn becomes a major incentive for China to develop its military power? China will be around long after the U.S. has lost military interest in this part of the world.

And so it continues. The media make much of opinion differences within Hatoyama’s ruling Democratic Party of Japan, in particular the failure to gain Cabinet unanimity on several domestic issues. But it is basic Democracy 101 that within any functioning government there should be differences of opinion and debates to solve them.

I once worked in an Australian government where Cabinet debates would last hours and could only be resolved by razor-thin voting majorities in the Cabinet room itself. Meanwhile, democratic Japan is supposed to operate like some tin-pot autocracy boasting national unity.

The government is criticized by the same media for going back on some of its earlier idealistic promises. But it has done so mainly because it now realizes the need for more stimulus to the economy and for the income to finance it. Meanwhile, the same media criticize the government for failure to stimulate the economy and to find the income needed to improve the nation finances.

Japan deserves better than this. At the very least it deserves something better than a small-town Brazilian crime reporter play-acting.

This article by Gregory Clark first appeared in the Japan Times and has been republished on this site with the author’s kind permission. Gregory Clark is vice-president of Akita International University and a former member of the Bank of Japan, Expert Consultative Committee.


11 responses so far ↓

  • 1 Biker Pete // May 27, 2010 at 5:44 pm

    Sounds a little like the Brit researcher studying serial killers, who has just been caught serially (surreally?) killing prostitutes with a crossbow. The self-analysis was probably driving him crazy… .

  • 2 Greg Atkinson // May 27, 2010 at 9:50 pm

    The media are sometimes a nasty piece of work. A while back in Australia for example they let Rudd get away with just about anything, now they have turned on him like a pack of dogs. It sometimes makes me think that the media has too much influence on public opinion.

  • 3 Biker // May 27, 2010 at 11:28 pm

    When McLuhan stated that ‘the medium is the message’, back in the sixties, he could never have foreseen how much more true this would become, with the rise of the then unknown internet.

    OK, we are, right this instant, immersed in _this_ medium. How has it changed us forever? Consider my frustration, expressed earlier today, as a result of the slow response of tradesmen to my needs. How much of that anger is heightened by the sheer instancy of this medium? How much more true for those who have never known a world without it?

    I worked with Charles Ungerleider, at UBC, during the mid-80s. His incredible knowledge of the print media opened my eyes to tricks I should have seen for myself, years before. And yes, our print media are a pack of jackals, but novices compared to the spawn of Satan who write for the English tabloids… .

    Abbott too is taking a hammering right now. The ABC practically crucified him tonight. You could _feel_ each nail.

  • 4 Greg Atkinson // May 28, 2010 at 11:54 pm

    I am not sure much has changed since the days of Ancient Rome when the Emperors used the Colosseum as their “medium”. Back then they aimed to keep the plebs fed and entertained…sounds similar to what happens today….Rudd dishes out stimulus money and holds summits with movie stars!

  • 5 Greg Atkinson // Jun 5, 2010 at 9:40 am

    Well Hatoyama is out and Japan now has a new Prime Minister. I wonder how long Naoto Kan will last? See: http://search.japantimes.co.jp/cgi-bin/nn20100605a2.html

  • 6 Ned S // Jun 5, 2010 at 6:26 pm

    What has it been? – 5 PMs in 6 years or 6 PMs in 5 years? (or somesuch) – That’s a damn high attrition rate! – Worse than being one of King Henry VIII’s wives!!! You’d never see that in the “rest” of the West – For better or worse.

    I’m assuming (albeit totally ignorantly) it’s a cultural thing maybe?

  • 7 Greg Atkinson // Jun 7, 2010 at 9:02 pm

    Well Ned if Rudd gets turned over at the next election then in Australia we may end up with 3 PM’s in 4 years, so it may not be a cultural thing at all.

    Maybe getting rid of dud PM’s in a timely fashion is actually healthy for a democracy?

  • 8 Biker // Jun 24, 2010 at 1:46 pm

    “Media vultures circle Japan’s P.M.”

    Couldn’t happen in Oz!~ 🙂

  • 9 Greg Atkinson // Jun 24, 2010 at 2:20 pm

    It was actually worse in Australia I think because first most of the media went around praising anything Rudd did. Remember how the media soaked up the 2020 Summit?

    But when the public started to turn on Rudd the media turned on him even more.

    I am no great fan of Rudd as you know, but I do think it was premature for the ALP to dump him. He should have been given the chance to run for re-election.

  • 10 Ned S // Jun 24, 2010 at 3:13 pm

    Well, that’s our “3 PMs in 4 years” then – So let’s hope for four (or more)! Given that we aren’t allowed to speak ill of the dead; Does that mean Kev is officially classified as “dead”; Or can I still speak ill of him? 🙂

  • 11 Biker // Jun 24, 2010 at 7:52 pm

    HaHa… Remember Howard was ‘dead’ once! (But he was resurrected… to save us from CGT and bring us TTRs!~)

    Never had that much time for Howard, but I’ve got to acknowledge those debts… !~ 😉

Leave a Comment

*


 


This site is not intended to act as any form of financial or investment advice.  © 2008–2017 Shareswatch Australia — DisclaimerCutline by Chris Pearson

 

The information contained in this website is for general information purposes only. Whilst we endeavour to keep the information up-to-date and correct, we make no representations or warranties of any kind, express or implied, about the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability or availability with respect to the website or the information, products, services, or related graphics contained on the website for any purpose. Any reliance you place on such information is therefore strictly at your own risk. Please seek professional advice before making any investments.